- Six Models Across Four Modalities
- LFM3 vs. LFM2.5: 8× More Context, Fewer Vision Parameters
- Tri-Hybrid Architecture Targets 14 Processor Classes
- A 1.9B Vision Model Competing With 12B-Class Models
- LFM3-1.7B Tops Liquid AI's Device-Efficiency Pareto Frontier
- Where the Six Models Fit
- What Remains Unverified
The lineup features a new tri-hybrid architecture, support for 14 processor classes, and single-GPU fine-tuning.
The company claims its 1.9B-parameter LFM3-VL-2B competes with Gemma 4 12B, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, and GPT-5.6 Luna.
Six Models Across Four Modalities
| Model | Parameters | Key specifications |
| LFM3-1.7B | 1.7B | Text generation, 256K context |
| LFM3-VL-2B | 1.9B | Vision-language processing, video input, spatial understanding |
| LFM3-Audio-2B | ~2B | Voice chat, tool calling, reasoning in 18 languages |
| LFM3-Omni-2B | ~2B | Combined vision, audio, and language |
| d1-2B | ~2B | Typed outputs, calibrated probabilities |
| d1-Omni-2B | ~2B | Audio input, structured decisions |
The d1 models generate typed decisions with calibrated probabilities in a single inference pass rather than relying on free-form text generation.
LFM3 vs. LFM2.5: 8× More Context, Fewer Vision Parameters
| Specification | LFM2.5 | LFM3 |
| Text model | LFM2.5-1.2B | LFM3-1.7B |
| Text parameters | 1.17B | 1.7B |
| Context window | 32K | 256K |
| Architecture | Convolution + attention hybrid | Tri-hybrid |
| Vision model | LFM2.5-VL-3B | LFM3-VL-2B |
| Vision parameters | ~3.1B | 1.9B |
| Multimodal support | Separate modality-specific models | Audio, vision, and omni variants |
| Hardware optimization | CPU, GPU, NPU | 14 processor classes |
LFM3 increases text context capacity by 8× while reducing the flagship vision model's parameter count by approximately 39%.
These figures describe architectural and capacity changes, not measured improvements in accuracy or speed.
Tri-Hybrid Architecture Targets 14 Processor Classes
LFM3 replaces the previous hybrid convolution-and-attention design with a new tri-hybrid architecture.
Liquid AI reports three deployment capabilities:
- Optimization for 14 processor classes across CPUs, GPUs, and NPUs.
- Single-GPU fine-tuning.
- On-device inference across text, vision, audio, and decision models.
Detailed architectural components, GPU memory requirements, and fine-tuning configurations were not provided in the announcement.
A 1.9B Vision Model Competing With 12B-Class Models
Liquid AI claims LFM3-VL-2B delivers competitive performance against significantly larger models.
| Model | Parameters | Comparison |
| LFM3-VL-2B | 1.9B | New Liquid AI vision model |
| Gemma 4 12B | 12B | ~6.3× larger |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Not specified | Claimed competitive performance |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | Not specified | Claimed competitive performance |
For reference, the previous LFM2.5-VL-3B achieved the following company-reported results:
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-3B |
| ScreenSpot-v2 | 80.7 |
| ToolSandbox | 59.5 |
| BFCL v4 | 32.5 |
| RefCOCO | 87.9 |
| BLINK | 50.2 |
These are previous-generation benchmark results, not LFM3 scores. The LFM3 announcement does not include numerical results or standardized testing configurations to independently validate its competitive claims.
LFM3-1.7B Tops Liquid AI's Device-Efficiency Pareto Frontier
Liquid AI positions LFM3-1.7B at the top of the Pareto frontier in its Pipette device-intelligence benchmark.
Pipette evaluates model quality and deployment efficiency, including inference throughput, latency, and memory requirements.
However, the announcement does not disclose exact LFM3 measurements for tokens per second, time to first token, VRAM consumption, or energy efficiency.
Where the Six Models Fit
| Use case | Model |
| Long-document analysis | LFM3-1.7B |
| Video understanding | LFM3-VL-2B |
| Multilingual voice assistants | LFM3-Audio-2B |
| Vision-and-audio agents | LFM3-Omni-2B |
| Classification and scoring | d1-2B |
| Audio-based decision systems | d1-Omni-2B |
What Remains Unverified
LFM3 brings an 8× larger text context window, a smaller vision-language model, integrated multimodal processing, and new decision-focused variants.
Its claimed performance against Gemma 4 12B and other competitors remains unverified without published LFM3 benchmark scores, latency measurements, and hardware configurations.